Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Could Key 9/11 Video Be Fraudulent ???

9/11 is the conspiracy theory that will never die. And the root cause for that is the US government itself:

The strongest evidence linking the alleged hijackers to 9/11 was a video said to be from the closed circuit TV (CCTV) system at Dulles International Airport in Washington DC. The video was not made available until the day before the 9/11 Commission Report was released, in 2004, and it helped to pave the way for widespread acceptance of the official account. Since the other evidence against the accused hijackers was dubious and suspiciously convenient for the FBI, which provided it, the Dulles video should be examined closely.

Doing so has led some independent 9/11 investigators to conclude that the Dulles video contains “no information to link its images to AA 77.” Reasons include that:

  • None of the Dulles airport staff remembered seeing the alleged hijackers at the airport
  • Dulles had over 300 cameras but no footage was released except for portions of this one video (and no video was available from the other airports)
  • The alleged Dulles video contains no date, time stamp, or camera identification
  • The video was shot at a rate of 30 frames per second (fps), which the investigators said is not typical of CCTV videos
  • The video appears to be an edited composite of shots taken from different angles

Additionally, it has been noticed that the airport screeners in the Dulles video did not perform their duties according to airport requirements. An attorney representing 9/11 victims’ families stated that security agents in the video screened the suspects in ways that were not like those required in Dulles training videos.

Could the video be fraudulent?

You can read the rest @
https://digwithin.net/2016/05/30/dulles_video/

Kudos to Kevin Ryan !!!

The only way the US government ever can persuade me the official 9/11 narrative is even partially true is to release ALL the security camera footage, including that from each and every camera which might have recorded whatever it was that hit the Pentagon.

As far as I am concerned, anything less is obstruction of justice.

No comments:

Post a Comment