Battle Of The Ten Armies

LTC Danny Davis has written an incisive essay about the battle for Mosul, and he recently was interviewed by Scott Horton:

Retired US Army colonel Daniel L. Davis discusses his article “Why the Battle for Mosul Could Become a Total Disaster;” and how US military intervention is paving the way for Al Qaeda/ISIS control of an actual state - not the pseudo state currently held in Iraq.

You can listen to the podcast @
https://www.libertarianinstitute.org/scotthortonshow/102116-danny-davis-on-the-battle-of-the-ten-armies/

And you can find the essay itself @
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-skeptics/why-the-battle-mosul-could-become-total-disaster-18087

Mention of "the ten armies" appears to be incidental, but does it not remind you of the following scripture:

And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.

Revelation 17:12 KJV

One really cannot be a king unless one has an army. Do these ten armies represent ten kings? And might that mean "the beast" is the US/NATO entity which is behind the battle for Mosul?

It's only about 700 miles from Mosul to Megiddo:

Is all this a prelude to Armageddon? If the Whore of Babylon wins the election on November 8, you better believe it.